On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 07:54, Nick Hudson <nicholas.a.hud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/01/2019 22:56, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > > This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for > > more information: > > The files being touched have lots of coding style problems already. I'm > avoiding i) fixing these in the same diff for clarity and ii) in the > case of IH_TYPE_KERNEL_NOLOAD, following existing formatting.
Our usual rule of thumb is "keep checkpatch happy", ie don't introduce new style issues, even if the code being modified is a bit messy. In this case it's no big deal -- if you've already sent v5 I can just wrap the long lines when I apply the patch to my tree. thanks -- PMM
