On 11/30/2018 04:27 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:23:14 +0100 > Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >> On 31/10/2018 11:49, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:58:33 +0800 >>> Yi Min Zhao <zyi...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 在 2018/10/24 上午5:25, Cornelia Huck 写道: >>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:17:34 +0100 >>>>> Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> ...snip... >> >>>> If endianness has error, I think the values must looks wrong. >>>> The right thing is that values increase from 0 and intervally. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks for pointing me to that file; when I run under tcg, the values >>> indeed look like they have an endianness issue: >>> >>> Update interval: 4000 ms >>> Samples: 637534208 >>> Last update TOD: f4c01d0098000000 >>> Load operations: 10520408729537478656 >>> Store operations: 5980780305148018688 >>> Store block operations: 0 >>> Refresh operations: 0 >>> Allocated pages: 0 >>> Mapped pages: 0 >>> Unmapped pages: 0 >>> >>> (virtio-net-pci device on a just-booted guest) >>> >> >> Hy Conny, >> >> I saw we lack a response to Thomas. >> Otherwise have you any remark? > > I don't remember anything beyond the endianess issue. >
This patch looks sane to me (I've lost the parent email on my client, else I would've replied directly to that). I'm currently awaiting getting my system up-and-running to test this thoroughly. Shall we do one more round with the endianess addressed in the mean time? -- Respectfully, - Collin Walling
