On 2011-03-08 18:41, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/08/2011 07:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>>> The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a >>>>>> regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? >>>>> >>>>> Can't follow. What do you mean? >>>> >>>> I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this >>> test >>>> definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu >>> non-iothread. >>>> What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm. >> >> That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes? I wasn't talking about >> that in the call. > > Of course, this is an important issue in its own right.
For sure, and it must also go in before starting to looki at glib mainloops etc. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
