On 03/08/2011 07:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a
>>> regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no?
>>
>> Can't follow. What do you mean?
>
> I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this
test
> definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu
non-iothread.
> What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm.
That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes? I wasn't talking about
that in the call.
Of course, this is an important issue in its own right.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
