On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:13:46 -0200 Fabiano Rosas <faro...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> This will be used in a future patch to implement an > architecture-specific single step mechanism for POWER. > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@linux.ibm.com> > --- > accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 10 ++++++++++ > exec.c | 1 + > include/sysemu/kvm.h | 4 ++++ > target/arm/kvm.c | 4 ++++ > target/i386/kvm.c | 4 ++++ > target/mips/kvm.c | 4 ++++ > target/ppc/kvm.c | 4 ++++ > target/s390x/kvm.c | 4 ++++ > 8 files changed, 35 insertions(+) > > @@ -431,6 +433,8 @@ void kvm_arch_remove_all_hw_breakpoints(void); > > void kvm_arch_update_guest_debug(CPUState *cpu, struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg); > > +void kvm_arch_set_singlestep(CPUState *cpu, int enabled); Might be useful to add a comment here that describes what common code expects the arch-specific function to do here so they don't step on each others toes. > + > bool kvm_arch_stop_on_emulation_error(CPUState *cpu); > > int kvm_check_extension(KVMState *s, unsigned int extension);
