From: Seth Kintigh <skint...@gmail.com>
I corrected these 2 memory regions based on specifications from the chip
manufacturer. The existing ranges seem to overlap and and cause odd
behavior and/or crashes when trying to set up multiple UARTs,
Signed-off-by: Seth Kintigh <skint...@gmail.com>
---
Phil, I hope this is the right format.
PMM, my original changes were made on an old version, but I made the patch
from the latest version per the instructions. I'm glad to hear that serial
port limit is gone!
hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c | 2 +-
hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c b/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c
index 032b5fda13..f3363a2952 100644
--- a/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c
+++ b/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void stm32f2xx_usart_init(Object *obj)
sysbus_init_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), &s->irq);
memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio, obj, &stm32f2xx_usart_ops, s,
- TYPE_STM32F2XX_USART, 0x2000);
+ TYPE_STM32F2XX_USART, 0x400);
sysbus_init_mmio(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), &s->mmio);
}
diff --git a/hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c b/hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c
index 58fc7b1188..ae744d1642 100644
--- a/hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c
+++ b/hw/timer/stm32f2xx_timer.c
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void stm32f2xx_timer_init(Object *obj)
sysbus_init_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), &s->irq);
memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem, obj, &stm32f2xx_timer_ops, s,
- "stm32f2xx_timer", 0x4000);
+ "stm32f2xx_timer", 0x400);
sysbus_init_mmio(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), &s->iomem);
s->timer = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, stm32f2xx_timer_interrupt,
s);
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 7:05 AM Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 4 November 2018 at 07:42, Seth K <skint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I corrected these 2 memory regions based on specifications from the chip
> > manufacturer. The existing ranges seem to overlap and and cause odd
> > behavior and/or crashes when trying to set up multiple UARTs,
> > I also played with changing MAX_SERIAL_PORTS to 8 to match the hardware,
> > but I did not include that in this patch as I never fully tested its
> > effects.
>
> Hi; thanks for the patch. As Philippe says, it looks good,
> but the one thing we definitely need is a Signed-off-by:
> line from you.
>
> A minor note -- there is no "MAX_SERIAL_PORTS" definition
> in QEMU any more: we removed that artificial limitation
> earlier this year. Maybe you're basing your patch on an
> older version of QEMU? It's best to use git master for
> development. Our SoC model defines 6 uarts (STM_NUM_USARTS)
> in hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c, which should all now be connectable
> on the command line, though I haven't tested that or checked
> whether the hardware has 6 or some other number...
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
