On 13.11.18 10:03, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:34:34 +0100 > David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 12.11.18 18:14, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:03:09 +0100 >>> David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The hotplug code needs more love, but let's do some obvious cleanups >>>> first. In the future, we want to propery make use of unplug_request() + >>>> unplug(), instead of routing everything (especially two separate but >>>> linked) devices via a single unplug call. Also, we want to move all >>>> errors in plug() into the pre_plug() handler, but this will require >>>> general PCI refactorings (moving stuff from realize() to the pre_plug/plug >>>> handler). >>>> >>>> This series is based on "[PATCH v2 00/10] pci: hotplug handler reworks", >>>> which contains one cleanup for s390x. >>>> >>>> David Hildenbrand (4): >>>> s390x/zpci: drop msix.available >>> >>> queued to s390-next >>> >>>> s390x/zpci: use hotplug_dev instead of looking up the host bridge >>> >>> Do we have consensus on that one yet? I can take it or leave it :) >>> >>>> s390x/zpci: move some hotplug checks to the pre_plug handler >>> >>> depends on the handler rework >> >> I can pull that one out from the general handler rework (still need >> review either way so it could take a while). > > It's 4.0 material anyway, so no need to hurry. > >> >>> >>>> s390x/zpci: properly fail if the zPCI device cannot be created >>> >>> Waiting for a fixed patch... can queue to s390-fixes if it arrives >>> soon(tm). >> >> Thanks! >> >> Shall I resend all or only this one? > > The last one would be great, as I think it's still 3.1 material. >
Alrighty, so I'll resend (after testing this time ;) ) the last patch. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb