On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:51:36AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 12/11/18 10:12, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 08:36:39PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > > Hi Gerd, > > > > > > On 11/9/18 3:20 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > > The rate of pulseaudio absorbing the audio stream is used to control the > > > > the rate of the guests audio stream. When the emulated hardware uses > > > > small chunks (like intel-hda does) we need small chunks on the audio > > > > backend side too, otherwise that feedback loop doesn't work very well. > > > > > > Shouldn't this be user-configurable? > > > > Why? > > When emulated hardware is not intel-hda?
Ok, maybe it is not required then, but it also doesn't hurt. Also, when making chunk size configurable we should not leave that to the confused user but pick a working value automatically, probably depending on the emulated device. I can't see what the benefit would be though, especially given that intel-hda is probably used in most configurations these days. cheers, Gerd
