Le jeu. 8 nov. 2018 11:30, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> a écrit : > On 2018-11-08 10:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 07/11/2018 20:30, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 2018-11-07 20:24, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>>> On 07/11/2018 16:41, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > >>>>> - The Kconfig parser would be used to generate the equivalent of > what we > >>>>> currently have under default-configs/ > >> > >> I think we would still have something like default-configs - but there > >> would only be the bare minimum config switches in there, the rest would > >> be pulled in by dependencies. > > > > Yes, in theory default-configs would end up empty, except for possibly > > some commented lines to show the "default y" symbols for the target. > > I think we should enable the machines in the default configs (and maybe > optional devices that are not automatically selected by machines), e.g.: > > CONFIG_I440FX=y > CONFIG_Q35=y > CONFIG_VIRTPC=y > CONFIG_ISAPC=y > CONFIG_VIRTIO=y > CONFIG_PARALLEL=y > > In configs/nemu (or configs/lean-kvm or however we'll call it), you will > then only have: > > CONFIG_Q35=y > CONFIG_VIRTPC=y >
CONFIG_VIRTX86 seems more XXI century. CONFIG_VIRTIO=y > > Would that make sense? > > Thomas > >
