On 07/11/2018 16:41, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > - The Kconfig parser would be used to generate the equivalent of what we > currently have under default-configs/
It would be used to generate config-devices.mak, instead of scripts/make_device_config.sh. My branch already had some Makefile integration. > - From a user's build perspective, there would be no noticeable > difference, ./configure && make. Internally, both steps will consume > the *.mak files generated by minikconf. Right. The only difference is that a user could do "./configure && make randconfig && make" and similar. Paolo
