On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:57:32PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Add a monitor_destroyed global to check if monitor_cleanup() has been > already called. In this case, don't insert the new monitor in the > list, but free it instead.
Pure question: how to trigger the condition when doing monitor cleanups? I can understand the problem to be fixed in the follow-up patch, but I don't know whether it's that helpful to have this patch though, especially considering that we're reaching softfreeze. > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > --- > monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c > index fffeb27ef9..7fe89daa87 100644 > --- a/monitor.c > +++ b/monitor.c > @@ -263,10 +263,11 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest; > /* QMP checker flags */ > #define QMP_ACCEPT_UNKNOWNS 1 > > -/* Protects mon_list, monitor_qapi_event_state. */ > +/* Protects mon_list, monitor_qapi_event_state, monitor_destroyed. */ > static QemuMutex monitor_lock; > static GHashTable *monitor_qapi_event_state; > static QTAILQ_HEAD(mon_list, Monitor) mon_list; > +static bool monitor_destroyed; > > /* Protects mon_fdsets */ > static QemuMutex mon_fdsets_lock; > @@ -4536,8 +4537,16 @@ void error_vprintf_unless_qmp(const char *fmt, va_list > ap) > static void monitor_list_append(Monitor *mon) > { > qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock); > - QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&mon_list, mon, entry); > + if (!monitor_destroyed) { > + QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&mon_list, mon, entry); > + mon = NULL; > + } > qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock); > + > + if (mon) { > + monitor_data_destroy(mon); > + g_free(mon); > + } > } > > static void monitor_qmp_setup_handlers_bh(void *opaque) > @@ -4631,6 +4640,7 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void) > > /* Flush output buffers and destroy monitors */ > qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock); > + monitor_destroyed = true; > QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(mon, &mon_list, entry, next) { > QTAILQ_REMOVE(&mon_list, mon, entry); > monitor_flush(mon); > -- > 2.19.0.271.gfe8321ec05 > Regards, -- Peter Xu