The qemu api claims to be easier to use, and the resulting code seems to agree.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> --- qapi/string-input-visitor.c | 17 ++++++----------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/qapi/string-input-visitor.c b/qapi/string-input-visitor.c index b3fdd0827d..c1454f999f 100644 --- a/qapi/string-input-visitor.c +++ b/qapi/string-input-visitor.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include "qemu/option.h" #include "qemu/queue.h" #include "qemu/range.h" +#include "qemu/cutils.h" struct StringInputVisitor @@ -46,10 +47,10 @@ static void free_range(void *range, void *dummy) static int parse_str(StringInputVisitor *siv, const char *name, Error **errp) { - char *str = (char *) siv->string; - long long start, end; + const char *str = (char *) siv->string; + const char *endptr; + int64_t start, end; Range *cur; - char *endptr; if (siv->ranges) { return 0; @@ -60,9 +61,7 @@ static int parse_str(StringInputVisitor *siv, const char *name, Error **errp) } do { - errno = 0; - start = strtoll(str, &endptr, 0); - if (errno == 0 && endptr > str) { + if (!qemu_strtoi64(str, &endptr, 0, &start)) { if (*endptr == '\0') { cur = g_malloc0(sizeof(*cur)); range_set_bounds(cur, start, start); @@ -71,11 +70,7 @@ static int parse_str(StringInputVisitor *siv, const char *name, Error **errp) str = NULL; } else if (*endptr == '-') { str = endptr + 1; - errno = 0; - end = strtoll(str, &endptr, 0); - if (errno == 0 && endptr > str && start <= end && - (start > INT64_MAX - 65536 || - end < start + 65536)) { + if (!qemu_strtoi64(str, &endptr, 0, &end) && start < end) { if (*endptr == '\0') { cur = g_malloc0(sizeof(*cur)); range_set_bounds(cur, start, end); -- 2.17.1