On 10/11/18 7:05 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 11 October 2018 at 11:45, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/10/2018 11:00, Mao Zhongyi wrote:
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
To: qemu-...@nongnu.org

Signed-off-by: Mao Zhongyi <maozhon...@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
  hw/arm/musicpal.c          | 16 ++++++++--------
  hw/audio/marvell_88w8618.c |  3 +--
  include/hw/audio/wm8750.h  |  1 +
  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/musicpal.c b/hw/arm/musicpal.c
index ac266f9253..6425f1d50f 100644
--- a/hw/arm/musicpal.c
+++ b/hw/arm/musicpal.c
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static void mv88w8618_eth_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
**errp)
  }

  static const VMStateDescription mv88w8618_eth_vmsd = {
-    .name = "mv88w8618_eth",
+    .name = TYPE_MV88W8618_ETH,

I understand TYPE_device name might changed, but once used,
VMStateDescription shouldn't, else this would break migration.
Thus I wouldn't recommend using TYPE_name in VMStateDescription.name.

Since I'm not sure I cc'ed the migration maintainers.

Yes, that's the usual approach -- the vmstate struct names
aren't inherently the same as the QOM type names, and so
we keep them decoupled to avoid accidentally breaking migration.

OK, I got it, will fix it in the next, thanks for the clarification.

thanks
Mao


thanks
-- PMM




Reply via email to