On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:22:12 +0200
Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 09/27/2018 02:29 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> +static void vfio_ap_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> >> +{
> >> + BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(klass);
> > I think calling the variable "oc" (or something similar) instead of
> > "klass" is prefered nowadays.
> >
> >> + k->get_dev_path = vfio_ap_bus_get_dev_path;
> >> + /* More than one vfio-ap device does not make sense */
> >> + k->max_dev = 1;
> > Would it make sense to set a DEVICE_CATEGORY here, too?
> >
>
> It would be
> set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC, dc->categories);
> I guess.
>
> People seem to do this, but I'm not sure what is the actual impact of having
> DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC set or not set, except for vfio_ap being listed as misc
> or uncategorized device respectively. Currently we have loader and vfio-ap
> uncategorized. Should loader become MISC too?
I think MISC is the right category.
