On 20.02.2011 23:20, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:09:46PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 20 February 2011 21:52, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: >>> While it's probably a good idea to define the commonly used values in >>> softfloat.h, I don't think we should have all the values used by the >>> different targets here. Infinity, one, half, two probably have their >>> place here, I don't think it's the case of 256 and 512. It should be >>> better to defined them at the target level. >> >> Are you happy with targets just doing make_float*() on a >> bit pattern? I guess that's the most straightforward thing, > > Yes, I think it is the way to go. > OK I will change that.
>>> Also for consistency, I >>> think it's better to define these value for all float size, or at least >>> for all the common ones (32, 64, maybe 16). >> >> I wouldn't bother with 16, only ARM uses that and only for >> conversions to other formats. >> > > That's true, so let's do it float 32 and 64. > I will add these too. Christophe.
