On 08/27/2018 02:00 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
---
  qobject/json-lexer.c      | 9 +++++----
  qobject/json-parser-int.h | 8 ++++----
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-
  typedef enum json_token_type {
-    JSON_MIN = 100,
-    JSON_LCURLY = JSON_MIN,
+    JSON_ERROR = 0,             /* must be zero, see json_lexer[] */
+    /* Gap for lexer states */
+    JSON_LCURLY = 100,
+    JSON_MIN = JSON_LCURLY,

In an earlier version of this type of cleanup, you swapped the IN_ and JSON_ values and eliminated the gap, to make the overall table more compact (no storage wasted on any of the states in the gap between the two).

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-08/msg01178.html

Is it still worth trying to minimize the gap between the two sequences, even if you now no longer swap them in order?

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Reply via email to