On 08/22/2018 07:52 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2018-08-22 13:43, Max Reitz wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I'd like .main_loop_settle(). Or .main_loop_post_run(). I think it's
>> OK to have names that aren't as cool and tense as possible, when in
>> return they actually tell you what they're doing. (Sure,
>> .main_loop_post_run() sounds really stupid, but it tells you exactly
>> when the function is called and what it's for.)
>
> Looking at the next patch, I realized that .main_loop_complete() or
> .complete_in_main_loop() would work just as well. (No, I don't see any
> confusion with whether you need to call job_completed(), especially
> since after this series you can probably make that function static to
> job.c.)
>
> Max
>
I'm sorry to announce that after the part two of this series, the
callback will be erased completely, so the name is maybe less... important.
