On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 14:16:46 +0200
David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Our parent class (PC_DIMM) provides exactly the same function.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/mem/nvdimm.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/mem/nvdimm.c b/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
> index 4087aca25e..f974accbdd 100644
> --- a/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
> +++ b/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
> @@ -166,11 +166,6 @@ static void nvdimm_write_label_data(NVDIMMDevice
> *nvdimm, const void *buf,
> memory_region_set_dirty(mr, backend_offset, size);
> }
>
> -static MemoryRegion *nvdimm_get_vmstate_memory_region(PCDIMMDevice *dimm)
> -{
> - return host_memory_backend_get_memory(dimm->hostmem, &error_abort);
> -}
> -
> static void nvdimm_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> {
> PCDIMMDeviceClass *ddc = PC_DIMM_CLASS(oc);
> @@ -178,7 +173,6 @@ static void nvdimm_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>
> ddc->realize = nvdimm_realize;
> ddc->get_memory_region = nvdimm_get_memory_region;
> - ddc->get_vmstate_memory_region = nvdimm_get_vmstate_memory_region;
>
> nvc->read_label_data = nvdimm_read_label_data;
> nvc->write_label_data = nvdimm_write_label_data;
