On 3 May 2018 at 10:07, Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:21:00AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> I don't see an issue with time-based numbering schemes. Ubuntu made it >> popular and other projects (like DPDK) are doing the same thing now. >> >> The convention is YY.MM though, not YYMM. > > It feels like we've got quite a strong backing for time based versioning > amongst people replying here. I'd be happy with YY.MM
I'm not hugely in favour mostly because I don't much like changing version numbering formats -- does it really gain us anything? But I guess it's a bit of a bikeshed-colour question. thanks -- PMM
