On 30 April 2018 at 18:44, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >> An ideal long term approach would be to rearrange the CPU state >> so that the tlb_table was not so far along it, but this is tricky >> because it would move it from the "not cleared on CPU reset" part >> of the struct to the "cleared on CPU reset" part. > > Is that really a problem? Doesn't it mean we'll just reload the TLB > after a reset?
It was the sort of "this subtly changes the semantics on all hosts for the sake of an issue that's mips-hosts-only" change that I didn't want to try to reason through and make very close to release when we didn't have a lot of time to test the results... thanks -- PMM
