"Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> > > Hi Ed, Jason, > This set of patches change the e1000 migration code to make > it easier to keep with compatibility with older versions in backwards > migration; but I do need some advice whether I need to do more as well. > > I think the first and second patch are fairly uncontrovercial and I > would like them for 2.12, since it'll make any future changes easier. > The third one changes the default behaviour, so again I'd prefer it but > lets see what you think. > > My question however, without knowing the internals of the e1000, is > whether when ommitting the subsection, should the code in 2.12 be > changing the data it sends back in the main section of data? > > Dave
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> For the whole series. I would have merged patch 1 & 2, but as you are the one coding them. Later, Juan.
