Hi Shannon,
On 20/03/18 08:26, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> While we skip the GIC_INTERNAL irqs, we don't change the register offset
> accordingly. This will overlap the GICR registers value and leave the
> last GIC_INTERNAL irq's registers out of update.
>
> Fix this by skipping the registers banked by GICR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshengl...@huawei.com>
> ---
> hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> index 3536795..d423cba 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_get_priority(GICv3State *s,
> uint32_t offset, uint8_t *bmp)
> int irq;
>
> field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 8
> + * GICD_IPRIORITYR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> + * functionality is replaced by GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>. So it doesn't need to
> + * sync them.
> + */
> + offset += (8 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 8) {
> kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, ®, false);
> *field = reg;
> @@ -150,6 +156,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_put_priority(GICv3State *s,
> uint32_t offset, uint8_t *bmp)
> int irq;
>
> field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 8
> + * GICD_IPRIORITYR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> + * functionality is replaced by GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>. So it doesn't need to
> + * sync them.
> + */
> + offset += (8 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 8) {
> reg = *field;
> kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, ®, true);
> @@ -164,6 +176,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_get_edge_trigger(GICv3State *s,
> uint32_t offset,
> uint32_t reg;
> int irq;
>
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 2
> + * GICD_ICFGR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> + * functionality is replaced by GICR_ICFGR<n>. So it doesn't need to sync
> + * them.
> + */
> + offset += (2 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 2) {
> kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, ®, false);
> reg = half_unshuffle32(reg >> 1);
> @@ -181,6 +199,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_put_edge_trigger(GICv3State *s,
> uint32_t offset,
> uint32_t reg;
> int irq;
>
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 2
> + * GICD_ICFGR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> + * functionality is replaced by GICR_ICFGR<n>. So it doesn't need to sync
> + * them.
> + */
> + offset += (2 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 2) {
> reg = *gic_bmp_ptr32(bmp, irq);
> if (irq % 32 != 0) {
> @@ -222,6 +246,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_getbmp(GICv3State *s, uint32_t
> offset, uint32_t *bmp)
> uint32_t reg;
> int irq;
>
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the
> + * GICD_IGROUPR0/GICD_ISENABLER0/GICD_ISPENDR0/GICD_ISACTIVER0 registers
> + * are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding functionality is replaced by the
> + * GICR registers. So it doesn't need to sync them.
> + */
> + offset += (1 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 1) {
> kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, ®, false);
> *gic_bmp_ptr32(bmp, irq) = reg;
> @@ -235,6 +265,14 @@ static void kvm_dist_putbmp(GICv3State *s, uint32_t
> offset,
> uint32_t reg;
> int irq;
>
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the
> + * GICD_IGROUPR0/GICD_ISENABLER0/GICD_ISPENDR0/GICD_ISACTIVER0 registers
> + * are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding functionality is replaced by the
> + * GICR registers. So it doesn't need to sync them.
> + */
> + offset += (1 * sizeof(uint32_t));
I wonder we couldn't create a new for_each_dist_irq_reg() macro taking
the offset and clroffset and integrating that shift inside?
> + if (clroffset != 0)
nit style issue: brace needed here
Besides Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
Thanks
Eric
> + clroffset += (1 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 1) {
> /* If this bitmap is a set/clear register pair, first write to the
> * clear-reg to clear all bits before using the set-reg to write
>
