On 9 March 2018 at 15:15, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Michael Clark <m...@sifive.com> writes: > > <snip> >> >> BTW - I've integrated the following 3 branches into the riscv tree: >> >> - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/softfloat-snan-abort-fix >> - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2 >> - https://github.com/michaeljclark/riscv-qemu/tree/qemu-devel >> >> into our `riscv-all` integration branch, and we're now passing all FPU >> tests, interestingly, including the NaN-boxing of single precision values >> into doubles. We'll need to check that the riscv-tests testsuite is >> exhastive enough... Suprised! I think Richard might have thought about >> our NaN-boxing >> issue or some other sort of magic is going on :-) >> >> - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-all > > Is the SNaN patch going to get re-posted now it has had a review?
I'm just in the process of applying that to master now... -- PMM
