Hi Philippe, Thanks for reviewing my patch. Yes I though about it, a specific header file with only several lines seems not worth it, but otherwise I would have to define redundant macro in vmmouse.c. Currently rebundant macro is ok but if we need some more macros, we would end on creating a specific header at last, although I'm not sure whether we will really need more macros in the future.
P.S. I forgot to cc to qemu-devel, so I resend one. I apologize if two identical emails look confusing to you. 2018-03-08 4:27 GMT+08:00 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>: > Hi Zihan Yang, > > On 03/07/2018 01:55 PM, Zihan Yang wrote: > > Hi all, this is a bitesized patch from me a while ago, it seems a little > > old but I wonder if there is any opinion about it? Is it still valid? > > For a single TYPE use, I'm not sure use a specific header is useful > (patch #1). > The 2nd patch looks valid to me but I'm not a QOM link expert. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > 2018-02-04 15:28 GMT+08:00 Zihan Yang <whois.zihan.y...@gmail.com>: > > > >> The ps2_mouse property of vmmouse is still pointer type which > >> is defined by DEFINE_PROP_PTR. But qdev pointer property should > >> be avoided according to qdev-properties.h. Convert it to > >> QOM link relationship. > >> > >> It involves two patches because it requires the TYPE_I8042 > >> macro which is defined in another file. The first patch put > >> this macro into a single header file so that the macro can > >> be used elsewhere. The second patch does the actual work. > >> > >> Zihan Yang (2): > >> hw/input/pckdb: put TYPE_I8042 into a single header file > >> vmmouse: change qdev pointer property to qom link > >> > >> hw/i386/pc.c | 2 +- > >> hw/i386/vmmouse.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- > >> hw/input/pckbd.c | 2 +- > >> hw/input/pckbd.h | 6 ++++++ > >> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 hw/input/pckbd.h > >> > >> -- > >> 2.7.4 > >> > >> >
