On 16 February 2018 at 02:29, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> wrote: > using the sdbus_*() API. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> > --- > > RFC because how pl181_sdbus_create_inplace() doing class_init(SDBus) in > realize(pl181) seems weird...
In the two other places where we set the set_inserted and set_readonly methods for the SDBus class (pxa2xx_mmci.c and sdhci.c), we do it by defining a subclass of TYPE_SD_BUS, whose class init function can then set up the method pointers. Is there a reason not to do pl181 the same way as those two examples? thanks -- PMM
