On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:58:58AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 06/02/2018 21:30, Roman Kagan wrote: > > +/* > > + * Set given event flag for a given sint on a given vcpu, and signal the > > sint. > > + */ > > +int hyperv_set_evt_flag(HvSintRoute *sint_route, unsigned evtno) > > Any reason (e.g. something from the spec) not to spell "event" and > "eventno" in full?
None beyond me being on the "shortest-comprehensible-name" camp :) I thought "evt" was unambiguously parsed as "event", and "msg" as "message". Isn't it? Thanks, Roman.
