On 01/17/2018 10:13 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 17.01.2018 20:37, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> stfle.81 (ppa15) is a transparent facility that can be passed to the
>> guest without the need to implement hypervisor support. As this feature
>> can be provided by firmware we add it to all full models.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 1 +
>> target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h | 1 +
>> target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
>> index 5d1c210..1550ab0 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static const S390FeatDef s390_features[] = {
>> FEAT_INIT("msa4-base", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 77,
>> "Message-security-assist-extension-4 facility (excluding subfunctions)"),
>> FEAT_INIT("edat2", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 78, "Enhanced-DAT facility 2"),
>> FEAT_INIT("dfppc", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 80, "Decimal-floating-point
>> packed-conversion facility"),
>> + FEAT_INIT("ppa15", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 81, "PPA15 is installed"),
>> FEAT_INIT("bpb", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 82, "Branch Prediction Blocking"),
>> FEAT_INIT("vx", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 129, "Vector facility"),
>> FEAT_INIT("iep", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 130,
>> "Instruction-execution-protection facility"),
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
>> b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
>> index 4487cfd..4d93087 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ typedef enum {
>> S390_FEAT_MSA_EXT_4,
>> S390_FEAT_EDAT_2,
>> S390_FEAT_DFP_PACKED_CONVERSION,
>> + S390_FEAT_PPA15,
>> S390_FEAT_BPB,
>> S390_FEAT_VECTOR,
>> S390_FEAT_INSTRUCTION_EXEC_PROT,
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> index 95ee870..50bd3f4 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN7_GA1[] = {
>> S390_FEAT_SIE_GPERE,
>> S390_FEAT_SIE_IB,
>> S390_FEAT_SIE_CEI,
>> + S390_FEAT_PPA15,
>> S390_FEAT_BPB,
>
> Is the order in this list still correct?
Is the order in this array important as well? It seems to work fine. At least
PPA15 is correctly
ordered vs BPB.
