On 01/11/2018 10:09 AM, Michael Clark wrote: > > The RISC-V QEMU port is presently quite usable, and we have fedora and debian > folk both working on packacking for RISC-V. The general sentiment is does our > port need to be perfect to be accepted in-tree? or can we work on clean-ups > and > bug fixes in tree? We're pretty committed to transforming it into a high > quality port and we will have plently of time going forward to address any > issues. We have to balance cleanups and bug fixes for corner cases with adding > and improve device emulation support. So far all of the recent effort has gone > into the former, i.e. clean-ups and bug fixes, so you can be sure we will > attend to any remaining issues in the comitted blocks of time we have > available > to work on the port.
No, it doesn't have to be perfect to go in. I would like the actual errors fixed before going in; but I suppose this fp stuff falls into the "just cleanup" category. r~
