Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> writes: > 03.01.2011 16:23, EsbenHaabendal wrote: >> How should I interpret "Fix Released"? >> >> qemu in maverick is still 0.12.5 and 0.12.3 in lucid. > > Not all the world is ubuntu. In qemu (and qemu-kvm) the > issue is fixed in 0.13, which were released quite some > time ago. > >> Will this not be fixed in current stable LTS and non-LTS releases? > > There's no "stable LTS" and "non-LTS" releases in qemu, > there are plain releases.
Ok. I see. And the current importance for libvirt (Ubuntu) and qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) is marked as "Wishlist". So my question goes to these two components. When can we expect to see this fixed in current Ubuntu releases, of which I currently count at least maverick and lucid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447 Title: virsh save is very slow Status in libvirt virtualization API: Unknown Status in QEMU: Fix Released Status in “libvirt” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “qemu-kvm” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: As reported here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-December/msg00203.html "virsh save" is very slow - it writes the image at around 1MB/sec on my test system. (I think I saw a bug report for this issue on Fedora's bugzilla, but I can't find it now...) Confirmed under Karmic.
