Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 01/05/2018 12:47 AM, Michael Clark wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> +##
>>>> +{ 'struct': 'CpuInfoRISCV', 'data': { 'pc': 'int' } }
>>>
>>> Should this be 'uint64' or other specific type, rather than the generic
>>> 'int' (which happens to be 64 bits, but signed)? Other architectures
>>> use 'int' because of history, but we could use this chance to improve
>>> things if desired.
>>>
>>
>> I'll have to defer to your better judgement as to whether we need to change
>> this. I like consistency. Is it a change that needs to be made to multiple
>> arches? It sounds relatively low risk. You decide.
>>
>> QAPI Schema
>> M: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
>> M: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>
> I'm fine if this patch uses 'int' for consistency, and will wait for
Me too.
> Markus to chime in on whether changing CpuInfo to use specific integer
> types in general is worth a separate series later on.
I guess it is.
