Hi, Igor,
At 11/28/2017 11:07 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:36:30 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
From: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
It may be hard to read the assignment statement of "next_base", so
S/next_base += (1ULL << 32) - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
/next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
... for readability.
No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Message-Id: <1504231805-30957-3-git-send-email-douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Pls, retest/respin once 2.12 dev window is open
Yes, I will.
Thanks,
dou.
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 2af37a9129..73e3443bce 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -2381,7 +2381,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
MachineState *machine)
}
mem_base = 1ULL << 32;
mem_len = next_base - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
- next_base += (1ULL << 32) - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
+ next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
}
numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,
