On Thu,  5 Oct 2017 17:36:30 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:

> From: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> It may be hard to read the assignment statement of "next_base", so
> 
> S/next_base += (1ULL << 32) - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
>  /next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
> 
> ... for readability.
> 
> No functionality change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Message-Id: <1504231805-30957-3-git-send-email-douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Pls, retest/respin once 2.12 dev window is open

> ---
>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 2af37a9129..73e3443bce 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -2381,7 +2381,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
> MachineState *machine)
>              }
>              mem_base = 1ULL << 32;
>              mem_len = next_base - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
> -            next_base += (1ULL << 32) - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
> +            next_base = mem_base + mem_len;
>          }
>          numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
>          build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,


Reply via email to