On 10/18/2017 06:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Thus I think we really ought to deal with capstone in the same > way as dtc. We could make the check a little more advanced so that > it checks for the particular capstone feature QEMU wants. That way > if someone does have an outdated capstone we'd still use the submodule.
There's nothing I'm aware of besides bug fixes in between e.g. the fedora26 version of capstone and the one from git. r~
