On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:25:19AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:53:39PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > When accept failed, we should setup errp with the reason. More
> > > importantly, the caller may assume errp be non-NULL when error happens,
> > > and not setting the errp may crash QEMU.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > io/channel-socket.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c
> > > index 53386b7..7bc308e 100644
> > > --- a/io/channel-socket.c
> > > +++ b/io/channel-socket.c
> > > @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc,
> > > if (errno == EINTR) {
> > > goto retry;
> > > }
> > > + error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Unable to accept connection");
> > > goto error;
> >
> > OK, but this code actually has a bigger problem as well:
> >
> > the original is:
> >
> > cioc->fd = qemu_accept(ioc->fd, (struct sockaddr *)&cioc->remoteAddr,
> > &cioc->remoteAddrLen);
> > if (cioc->fd < 0) {
> > trace_qio_channel_socket_accept_fail(ioc);
> > if (errno == EINTR) {
> > goto retry;
> > }
> > goto error;
> > }
> >
> > Stefan confirmed that trace_ doesn't preserve errno; so the if
> > following it is wrong. It needs to preserve errno.
>
> Ah... If so, not sure whether we can do the reservation in trace codes
> in general?
>
> For this one, I can just move the trace_*() below the errno check.
> After all, if EINTR is got, it's not really a fail, so imho we should
> not trace it with "accept fail".
Agreed, we just need to move the trace below the if.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
