On 29.06.2017 15:12, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > >> On 28 June 2017 at 21:44, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The ucontext_t type had a tag struct ucontext until now >>> but newer glibc will drop it so we need to adjust and use >>> the exposed type instead >> >> If true this seems like a bug in glibc to break >> existing working programs, and it should be fixed there... > > I'd support that notion. However, SUSv2 documents ucontext_t, not > struct ucontext. Using the former instead of the latter makes sense as > a portability improvement, doesn't it? >
NetBSD ships with ucontext_t, no 'struct ucontext' available. Technically there is 'struct __ucontext', but nobody is allowed to use it sanely.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
