On 29.06.2017 15:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes:
> 
>> On 28 June 2017 at 21:44, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The ucontext_t type had a tag struct ucontext until now
>>> but newer glibc will drop it so we need to adjust and use
>>> the exposed type instead
>>
>> If true this seems like a bug in glibc to break
>> existing working programs, and it should be fixed there...
> 
> I'd support that notion.  However, SUSv2 documents ucontext_t, not
> struct ucontext.  Using the former instead of the latter makes sense as
> a portability improvement, doesn't it?
> 


NetBSD ships with ucontext_t, no 'struct ucontext' available.
Technically there is 'struct __ucontext', but nobody is allowed to use
it sanely.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to