Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 28 June 2017 at 21:44, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The ucontext_t type had a tag struct ucontext until now >> but newer glibc will drop it so we need to adjust and use >> the exposed type instead > > If true this seems like a bug in glibc to break > existing working programs, and it should be fixed there...
I'd support that notion. However, SUSv2 documents ucontext_t, not struct ucontext. Using the former instead of the latter makes sense as a portability improvement, doesn't it?
