On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:55:36PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > --- a/tools/libs/devicemodel/Makefile > > > +++ b/tools/libs/devicemodel/Makefile > > > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR): > > > libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR).$(MINOR) > > > $(SYMLINK_SHLIB) $< $@ > > > > > > libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR).$(MINOR): $(PIC_OBJS) libxendevicemodel.map > > > - $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(PTHREAD_LDFLAGS) -Wl,$(SONAME_LDFLAG) > > > -Wl,libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR) $(SHLIB_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(PIC_OBJS) > > > $(LDLIBS_libxentoollog) $(APPEND_LDFLAGS) > > > + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(PTHREAD_LDFLAGS) -Wl,$(SONAME_LDFLAG) > > > -Wl,libxendevicemodel.so.$(MAJOR) $(SHLIB_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(PIC_OBJS) > > > $(LDLIBS_libxentoollog) $(LDLIBS_libxencall) $(APPEND_LDFLAGS) > > > > > > > Isn't the dependency already encoded in tools/Rules.mk? > > How? Which makefile variable would include -lxencall in the abrove line? >
I was thinking about SHDEPS_* in Rules.mk. That's for something else. And you're right. We should fix it here. Wei.
