On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:15:29 -0300 Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:32:35PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > Introduce machine_set_cpu_numa_node() helper that stores > > node mapping for CPU in MachineState::possible_cpus. > > CPU and node it belongs to is specified by 'props' argument. > > > > Patch doesn't remove old way of storing mapping in > > numa_info[X].node_cpu as removing it at the same time > > makes patch rather big. Instead it just mirrors mapping > > in possible_cpus and follow up per target patches will > > switch to possible_cpus and numa_info[X].node_cpu will > > be removed once there isn't any users left. > > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> > > So, this patch is the one that makes "-numa" and "-numa cpu" > affect query-hotpluggable-cpus output. that was intent behind series. [...] > As noted in another message, I am not sure we really should make > "-numa" affect query-hotpluggable-cpus output unconditionally (I > believe we shouldn't). But we do, we need to document this very > clearly. What place would you suggest to document this at? [...]
