On 02/22/2017 10:44 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
* SO and OV reflects overflow of the 64-bit result in 64-bit mode and
  overflow of the low-order 32-bit result in 32-bit mode

* OV32 reflects overflow of the low-order 32-bit independent of the mode

Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 target/ppc/translate.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
index f3f92aa..43366e7 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate.c
+++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
@@ -809,10 +809,19 @@ static inline void gen_op_arith_compute_ov(DisasContext 
*ctx, TCGv arg0,
         tcg_gen_andc_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, t0);
     }
     tcg_temp_free(t0);
-    if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
-        tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov);
+    if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
+        tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
+        if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
+            tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov32);
+        } else {
+            tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 63, 1);
+        }
+    } else {
+        if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
+            tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov);
+        }
+        tcg_gen_shri_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, TARGET_LONG_BITS - 1);
     }
-    tcg_gen_shri_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, TARGET_LONG_BITS - 1);

We're computing this two different ways for no reason.  How about

  if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
    tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
    if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
        tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov);
    }
  } else {
    if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
        tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
    }
    tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 63, 1);
  }


r~


Reply via email to