On 02/15/2017 12:46 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Halil Pasic (pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: >> >> >> On 02/11/2017 05:26 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> On 02/10/2017 12:24 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >>>> * Halil Pasic (pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: >>>>> The member VMStateField.start is used for two things, partial data >>>>> migration for VBUFFER data (basically provide migration for a >>>>> sub-buffer) and for locating next in QTAILQ. >>>>> >>>>> The implementation of the VBUFFER feature is broken when VMSTATE_ALLOC >>>>> is used. This however goes unnoticed because actually partial migration >>>>> for VBUFFER is not used at all. >>>>> >>>>> Let's consolidate the usage of VMStateField.start by removing support >>>>> for partial migration for VBUFFER. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> >>>> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> >> >> Thanks for the review Philippe! >> >> @Maintainers: Softfreeze is approaching, and I would like to try >> get my 'array of pointers with null pointers' (which is on top of >> this) in 2.9 too if possible. Anything I can do to speed things up? > > It went in on Monday! > > Dave
Thank you very much! Halil > >> Regards, >> Halil >> > -- > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK >
