* Halil Pasic (pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > > > On 02/11/2017 05:26 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > On 02/10/2017 12:24 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > >> * Halil Pasic (pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > >>> The member VMStateField.start is used for two things, partial data > >>> migration for VBUFFER data (basically provide migration for a > >>> sub-buffer) and for locating next in QTAILQ. > >>> > >>> The implementation of the VBUFFER feature is broken when VMSTATE_ALLOC > >>> is used. This however goes unnoticed because actually partial migration > >>> for VBUFFER is not used at all. > >>> > >>> Let's consolidate the usage of VMStateField.start by removing support > >>> for partial migration for VBUFFER. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> > >> > > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> > > Thanks for the review Philippe! > > @Maintainers: Softfreeze is approaching, and I would like to try > get my 'array of pointers with null pointers' (which is on top of > this) in 2.9 too if possible. Anything I can do to speed things up?
It went in on Monday! Dave > Regards, > Halil > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
