On 18/11/2016 10:51, Alberto Garcia wrote: > >>> >> Honestly I don't see the point. It seems easier, more practical and >>> >> more effective to convert bdrv_aio_* to byte ranges, especially since >>> >> QED would be basically a rewrite. >> > >> > Well, it's an RFC for a reason, I want people to give their opinions >> > before consistently following through with this. But I do think that >> > we pointlessly offer too many different interfaces to do the same >> > thing in the block layer. > I cannot speak much about the AIO/coroutine interfaces (why do we have > both? is the latter supposed to supersede the former? I'd appreciate > some background here) but I did find the code easier to follow after > these patches, so from that point of view the series looks good to me.
If you like it, who am I to say no! :) Paolo
