On Fri 11 Nov 2016 11:22:26 AM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Honestly I don't see the point. It seems easier, more practical and >> more effective to convert bdrv_aio_* to byte ranges, especially since >> QED would be basically a rewrite. > > Well, it's an RFC for a reason, I want people to give their opinions > before consistently following through with this. But I do think that > we pointlessly offer too many different interfaces to do the same > thing in the block layer.
I cannot speak much about the AIO/coroutine interfaces (why do we have both? is the latter supposed to supersede the former? I'd appreciate some background here) but I did find the code easier to follow after these patches, so from that point of view the series looks good to me. Berto
