On 17 October 2016 at 22:24, Michael Roth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Quoting Peter Maydell (2016-10-17 13:45:21) >> On 17 October 2016 at 19:13, Michael Roth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> > We could do both though: use some ad-hoc way to tag for a particular >> > sub-maintainer tree/stable branch, as well as an explicit "not for >> > master" in the cover letter ensure it doesn't go into master. It's a bit >> > more redundant, but flexible in that people can use whatever tagging >> > format they want for a particular tree. >> >> Yes, that would be my preference. Gmail's filtering is not >> very good, and it doesn't seem to be able to support >> multiple or complex matches on the subject line, but >> it can deal with "doesn't include foo in body". >> People who actively want to look for stuff not to go >> into master can filter it however they like. > > Sounds good to me. For my part I think "for-2.7.1" etc. would be > prefereable. No need to resend this patchset though. > > I suppose MAINTAINERS would be the best place to document something > like this?
We have http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPullRequest and I've added a note to it. thanks -- PMM
