On Tue, 09/27 11:17, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Too bad that this seems to be too big a hammer that breaks the way gcov was > > used: 1) the "rm *.gcda" command now runs in each test, so it's harder to > > get an overall coverage report; 2) there is a risk that the parallism may > > corrupt those files. :( > > Almost no one will ever build with gcov support, so how about just > making the "normal" case run in parallel and add a special target > for running under gcov which serializes.
This sounds good to me. I'll take a look. Thanks. Fam > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
