On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 07:54 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > > > but I guess if you have the decoding of those "core" registers > > here as well, then that doesn't make so much sense.
Those core registers may well change with P9, we havne't looked closely yet... > yes and there is also the handling of the XSCOM failures. > > I can add some prologue handler to cover those "core" registers > but adding a MemoryRegion, ops, init and mapping would be a lot > of churn just to return 0. > > Thanks,
