On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Nathan Rossi <nat...@nathanrossi.com> wrote:
> Whilst according to the Zynq TRM this device covers a register region of
> 0x000 - 0x120. The register region is also shared with XADCIF prefix
> registers at 0x100 and above. Due to how the devcfg and the xadc devices
> are implemented in QEMU these are separate models with individual mmio
> regions. As such the region registered by the devcfg overlaps with the
> xadc when initialized in a machine model (e.g. xilinx-zynq-a9).
>
> This patch fixes up the incorrect region size, where
> XLNX_ZYNQ_DEVCFG_R_MAX is missing its '/ 4' causing it to be 0x460 in
> size. As well as setting the region size to the 0x0 - 0x100 region so
> that an xadc device instance can be registered in the correct region to
> pair with the devcfg device instance.
>
> Mapping with XLNX_ZYNQ_DEVCFG_R_MAX = 0x118:
>   dev: xlnx.ps7-dev-cfg, id ""
>     mmio 00000000f8007000/0000000000000460
>   dev: xlnx,zynq-xadc, id ""
>     mmio 00000000f8007100/0000000000000020
>
> Mapping with XLNX_ZYNQ_DEVCFG_R_MAX = 0x100 / 4:
>   dev: xlnx.ps7-dev-cfg, id ""
>     mmio 00000000f8007000/0000000000000100
>   dev: xlnx,zynq-xadc, id ""
>     mmio 00000000f8007100/0000000000000020
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <nat...@nathanrossi.com>

Good catch. What came up that caused you to find this?

Can this go via the target-arm queue Peter?

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com>

Thanks,

Alistair

> ---
>  include/hw/dma/xlnx-zynq-devcfg.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/dma/xlnx-zynq-devcfg.h 
> b/include/hw/dma/xlnx-zynq-devcfg.h
> index d40e5c8df6..9f5119a89a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/dma/xlnx-zynq-devcfg.h
> +++ b/include/hw/dma/xlnx-zynq-devcfg.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>  #define XLNX_ZYNQ_DEVCFG(obj) \
>      OBJECT_CHECK(XlnxZynqDevcfg, (obj), TYPE_XLNX_ZYNQ_DEVCFG)
>
> -#define XLNX_ZYNQ_DEVCFG_R_MAX 0x118
> +#define XLNX_ZYNQ_DEVCFG_R_MAX (0x100 / 4)
>
>  #define XLNX_ZYNQ_DEVCFG_DMA_CMD_FIFO_LEN 10
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>

Reply via email to