On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:02:54PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> target-ppc/kvm.c | 2 +-
> target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> index dcb68b9..20eb450 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@ void kvmppc_set_mpic_proxy(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int
> mpic_proxy)
>
> int kvmppc_smt_threads(void)
> {
> - return cap_ppc_smt ? cap_ppc_smt : 1;
> + return cap_ppc_smt ? cap_ppc_smt : 8;
> }
>
> #ifdef TARGET_PPC64
> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h b/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> index 5461d10..053db0a 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline void kvmppc_set_mpic_proxy(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> int mpic_proxy)
>
> static inline int kvmppc_smt_threads(void)
> {
> - return 1;
> + return 8;
> }
>
> static inline int kvmppc_or_tsr_bits(PowerPCCPU *cpu, uint32_t tsr_bits)
This doesn't make sense to me. Allowing multiple hardware threads to
be emulated in TCG (which I think will require a bunch of fixes) seems
like a separate question to MTTCG - i.e. allowing separate vcpus to be
TCG emulated in separate host threads.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
