On 03.08.2016 13:21, Kevin Wolf wrote: > There is no reason why an NBD server couldn't be started for any node, > even if it's not on the top level. This converts nbd-server-add to > accept a node-name. > > Note that there is a semantic difference between using a BlockBackend > name and the node name of its root: In the former case, the NBD server > is closed on eject; in the latter case, the NBD server doesn't drop its > reference and keeps the image file open this way. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> > --- > blockdev-nbd.c | 21 +++++++++------------ > qapi/block.json | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
As per the terms of surrender as stated on IRC: Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
