(Intentionally top-posting:) Hey Eric,
That's really odd. I don't recall changing anything, but I just checked my (other) e-mail on the nongnu.org's archive and indeed it looks awful. (It looks fine on both clients I use, though.) Thanks for letting me know, I'll sort this out. Cheers, Felipe > On 29 Jul 2016, at 21:42, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 07/29/2016 09:31 AM, Felipe Franciosi wrote: >> Heya, >> >> On 29 Jul 2016, at 13:47, Marc-André Lureau >> <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com<mailto:marcandre.lur...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Prerna Saxena >> <saxenap....@gmail.com<mailto:saxenap....@gmail.com>> wrote: >> From: Prerna Saxena >> <prerna.sax...@nutanix.com<mailto:prerna.sax...@nutanix.com>> > > Wow, your mailer's poor choice of quoting style makes it VERY difficult > to read your reply. > > >> +With this protocol extension negotiated, the sender (QEMU) can set the >> +"need_reply" [Bit 3] flag to any command. This indicates that >> +the client MUST respond with a Payload VhostUserMsg indicating success or >> +failure. The payload should be set to zero on success or non-zero on >> failure. >> +(Unless the message already has an explicit reply body) >> >> Unless/unless (for consistency, the rest of the document doesn't use >> Upper-case inside parentheses) >> >> Actually, if the sentence starts inside the parenthesis it should be capital. >> See rule 2a: >> http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/parens.asp >> >> Prerna's text looks correct to me. If it's wrong in other places we should >> probably fix it there separately. >> > > Based on the number of '>' inserted by my mailer, it appears that you > wrote all four of the above paragraphs. In reality, Prerna wrote the > first paragraph (quoted from the patch, Marc-André wrote the second, and > you wrote the third and fourth. In fact, your mailer ACTIVELY stripped > the '>' that was already present in Marc-André's mail when he quoted > Prerna, rather than the usual paradigm of adding yet another layer of '>'. > > You really need to get that fixed. We should not have to hunt and > compare multiple emails in order to determine what you are adding to the > conversation, nor mis-attribute it to the wrong author. > > > -- > Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org >
